Factsheet · RTA Manufacturing Overijssel

Industrial food processors

Industrial food processors process food at large scale, where small material shortcomings can have far-reaching consequences for public health. This factsheet from the Regional Transition Agenda Manufacturing Overijssel breaks down the material value, supply risk and circular revenue models of industrial food processors.

Go to the value chain Download the factsheet (PDF)

69%
food-grade stainless steel, the bulk of the weight (304 and 316 grades)
€2,500
value per tonne of martensitic stainless steel blades, the highest per tonne
€1,359m
economic perspective at product level in the region, the highest chain value
Tungsten
high risk, under new EU critical materials regulation, mainly sourced from China

What is an industrial food processor?

Industrial food processors process food at large scale. Small material shortcomings can have far-reaching consequences for public health, which is why the European Union applies strict rules. A change in materials carries through into the use phase: a different material type quickly requires different cleaning agents, which can have a stronger impact during use, shifting the problem rather than solving it.

Stainless (food-grade) steel makes up 69% of the weight, due to its corrosion resistance and durability in most food applications. Polymer materials and elastomers, together 5%, appear mainly in seals, gaskets, connecting rings, adhesives and lubricants, which must not come into contact with food.

Part of: the Regional Transition Agenda Circular Economy Overijssel, manufacturing industry · main project. Commissioned by: Province of Overijssel. Analysis: product footprint, material impact, supply risk and circular revenue models.

Product components

Six component groups together make up 95% of the total weight. Stainless steel in two grades, 304 and 316, carries the largest share of both weight and eco-costs. Martensitic stainless steel blades have the highest value per tonne.

ComponentWeightValue per tonneEco-costs per tonneShare of eco-costs
Vessels, pipes etc. in 304 stainless steel34.50%€966.00€445.8240.41%
Vessels, pipes etc. in 316 stainless steel34.50%€862.50€436.5639.57%
Electric motors11.00%€1,222.22€71.486.48%
Insulation10.00%€50.00€50.164.55%
Martensitic stainless steel blades5.00%€2,500.00€69.146.27%
Polymer seals5.00%€500.00€30.002.72%

Environmental impact and supply risk

Chromium has the highest environmental impact; it is needed for stainless steel. Grades 304 and 316 stainless steel also carry a high impact: these are also the heavier components of the end product.

Critical material. Tungsten falls under new EU critical materials regulation. It is sourced mainly from China and used to harden steel grades and in blades. That makes supply security part of product strategy.

Raw materialRiskExplanation
Tungstenhighunder new EU critical materials regulation, majority sourced from China, used to harden steel and in blades
Molybdenumsupply securitycritical in terms of long-term supply security

Where is value retained?

The second-hand price is relatively low, partly due to the potentially high pace of innovation in the sector: after prolonged use, newer and more effective systems become available. The largest costs and highest energy consumption sit in the use phase.

€1,359m
economic perspective at product level in the region, the highest value in the chain. Repair retains €1,087.20m and refurbishment €951.30m, while material-level recycling yields €47.87m. Source: RTA Manufacturing Overijssel, 2020.

Dilemma. Replacing equipment can make the work process more efficient and thereby reduce impact through lower energy consumption. But the replacement itself creates new impact during the production of the equipment.

The value-chain analysis compares the regional economic perspective by chain phase, from new materials to landfill.

Chain phaseRegional economic perspective (€ millions)
Materials (virgin/new materials)€95.75
Components (new components)€460.60
Product€1,359.00
Reuse (product)€543.60
Repair (product)€1,087.20
Refurbish (product)€951.30
Remanufacture (secondary components in/for product)€679.50
Repurpose (components for or as another product)€679.50
Recycle (materials)€47.87
Landfill (lost)€−95.75

Revenue models and scores

The lease model and the performance model apply best: food-processing machines can be deployed more effectively. An access model may become possible over time, for example when regional deployment of large-scale, high-value systems delivers a use-phase advantage across the full lifespan. The greatest economic potential lies in refurbishment.

Opportunities and points of attention for circularity:

  • High potential for circularity: products have a relatively high price and a long technical lifespan.
  • A high frequency of use for these machines.
  • Machines are currently sold on the secondary market.
  • The food system changes incrementally, so machines are not suddenly written off; the supply of new machines does evolve alongside it.
  • Research is underway within the agri-food sector into chain collaboration and innovative revenue models with regional knowledge institutions.

Product properties that support circularity, scored from 1 (low indication) to 5 (high indication):

Product propertyScore (1–5)
Price per unit5
Frequency of use4
Predictability of demand4
Recyclability4
Modularity4
Technical lifespan3
Product simplicity3

Further reading

This factsheet belongs to the main project on circular revenue models in the Overijssel manufacturing industry and connects to New Economy’s broader services around product footprint and circular design.

Insights from this project

From this project

Citable insights

Figures, observations and recommendations from Industrial Food Processors. Free to use under CC BY 4.0, with attribution.

All insights

Frequently asked questions

What are industrial food processors made of?

Food-grade stainless steel in grades 304 and 316 makes up 69% of the weight, due to corrosion resistance and durability. They also consist of electric motors, insulation, martensitic stainless steel blades and polymer seals.

Which raw materials are critical in food processors?

Tungsten carries a high risk and falls under new EU critical materials regulation; it is sourced mainly from China. Molybdenum is critical for long-term supply security. Chromium has the highest environmental impact.

How circular are industrial food processors?

Circularity potential is high: the products have a relatively high price, a long technical lifespan and an active secondary market. Refurbishment offers the most economic potential.

Why does most of the impact sit in the use phase?

The largest costs and highest energy consumption occur during the use phase. Replacement can make the work process more efficient and reduce impact, but the replacement itself creates new impact during equipment production.

From factsheet to circular strategy

The analysis makes visible where material value, critical raw materials and revenue models converge. Product Footprint and circular design translate these insights into choices in design, procurement, service and reverse logistics.

View Product Footprint
Scroll to Top